Axynom
  • Introduction
    • What is Axynom?
    • Vision & Mission
  • Why Now
  • Founder's Note
  • The Problem
    • Centralized growth traps
  • Token reward inflation and failure
  • Lack of contributor alignment
  • Gatekeeping in Web3
  • Axynom Solution Overview
    • Proof of Growth (PoG)
    • Contributor as a Stakeholder
    • Transparent Rewards and Governance
  • Modular Ecosystem Architecture
  • PoG: Proof of Growth System
    • What is PoG
    • How Contributions Work
    • Voting and Governance Flow
  • GP: Growth Points
  • Role of Admins, Moderators, and Community
  • Examples of Valid Contributions
  • Axynom Token (AXY)
    • Token Utility
    • Tokenomics
  • Transfer Tax Logic
  • Governance Eligibility
  • Vesting and Distribution
  • Staking Mechanics
    • Lock Periods and APY
    • Early Exit Penalties
    • Sustainability Model
  • Treasury and Ecosystem Pools
    • Overview of Pools
    • Role of the Treasury
    • POL Strategy (Protocol-Owned Liquidity)
  • CaaS (Contributions-as-a-Service)
    • What is CaaS
    • Exporting the PoG System
    • Integration Possibilities
    • Revenue Model for Axynom
  • Governance & Voting
    • Governance Phases
    • Voting Power (AXY + GP)
    • Quorum & Approval Logic
    • No ‘Adjust GP’ Rule
  • Gas Economics
    • Why Arbitrum One
    • Axynom L3 Chain with AXY as Gas
  • Product Roadmap
    • Phase 1: MVP Launch (Staking, PoG, Treasury)
    • Phase 2: CaaS, L3 Chain, Scaled Contributor Base
    • Key Milestones
    • TGE Timeline (After Product-Market Fit)
  • Security & Audits
    • Upgradability Practices
    • Modular Contract Architecture
    • Audit Strategy Post-TGE
    • Role of Community Peer Review
  • KPI Forecast & Growth Goals
    • Contributors, GP Points, Stakers, TVL
    • Expected PoG Submissions
    • Treasury Size & Rewards Flow
    • Marketing & KOL Activation Plans
  • Conclusion
    • Axynom Is Not a Product. It’s a Protocol.
    • Call to Builders, Shillers, Designers, Thinkers
    • How to Get Involved
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  • What is Protocol-Owned Liquidity?
  • Advantages of POL
  1. Treasury and Ecosystem Pools

POL Strategy (Protocol-Owned Liquidity)

Protocol-Owned Liquidity (POL) is a key part of Axynom’s financial architecture. Instead of relying entirely on external liquidity providers, Axynom gradually builds and maintains its own liquidity reserves, owned and controlled by the protocol.

This strategy strengthens trading stability, reduces dependency on mercenary liquidity, and transforms liquidity from a liability into an ecosystem asset.


What is Protocol-Owned Liquidity?

Protocol-Owned Liquidity refers to liquidity pool (LP) tokens or assets that are owned directly by Axynom’s contracts or Treasury, not by individual users.

In Axynom:

  • Part of the Liquidity Pool allocation is used to seed trading pairs like AXY/ETH.

  • Liquidity incentives (from the Community Allocation) are offered to early providers, but over time, the protocol itself grows its ownership share.

  • POL becomes a permanent asset, supporting healthy market conditions without depending on short-term incentives.

Unlike traditional yield farms, where liquidity providers can exit at any time, POL stays within the ecosystem as long as the protocol exists.


Advantages of POL

Market Stability

POL ensures that:

  • Trading pairs retain deep liquidity even during market volatility

  • Slippage for buyers and sellers remains low

  • Liquidity crises are less likely during periods of price movement or reduced activity

Stability supports both user confidence and broader ecosystem integrations.

Fee Revenue Capture

As a liquidity provider, Axynom earns a share of trading fees generated by its owned LP positions.

  • These fees are collected by the protocol itself

  • Revenue can be reinvested into the Treasury, distributed to contributors, or used for future incentive programs

POL transforms liquidity into a yield-generating asset for the ecosystem.

Reduced Reliance on Short-Term Incentives

Protocols that depend solely on external liquidity providers must continuously offer rewards to keep liquidity active. When incentives dry up, liquidity disappears.

With POL, Axynom:

  • Reduces the need for high, ongoing liquidity mining emissions

  • Keeps trading pairs functional even without active external campaigns

  • Builds strategic independence from mercenary participants

This approach aligns with Axynom’s broader philosophy: systems should be self-sustaining, not dependent on endless external subsidies.

POL Growth Over Time

Axynom’s POL strategy is gradual and layered:

  1. Initial seeding of liquidity pools using a portion of Liquidity Pool incentives

  2. Progressive buybacks or liquidity provision expansions from Treasury surplus if available

  3. Reinvestment of LP fee revenue to grow the POL base

POL growth is not rushed. It is a cumulative process that strengthens Axynom’s economic position year over year.


Owning the foundation of trading allows the protocol to focus on building, not constantly defending market access.

PreviousRole of the TreasuryNextWhat is CaaS

Last updated 1 month ago