Axynom
  • Introduction
    • What is Axynom?
    • Vision & Mission
  • Why Now
  • Founder's Note
  • The Problem
    • Centralized growth traps
  • Token reward inflation and failure
  • Lack of contributor alignment
  • Gatekeeping in Web3
  • Axynom Solution Overview
    • Proof of Growth (PoG)
    • Contributor as a Stakeholder
    • Transparent Rewards and Governance
  • Modular Ecosystem Architecture
  • PoG: Proof of Growth System
    • What is PoG
    • How Contributions Work
    • Voting and Governance Flow
  • GP: Growth Points
  • Role of Admins, Moderators, and Community
  • Examples of Valid Contributions
  • Axynom Token (AXY)
    • Token Utility
    • Tokenomics
  • Transfer Tax Logic
  • Governance Eligibility
  • Vesting and Distribution
  • Staking Mechanics
    • Lock Periods and APY
    • Early Exit Penalties
    • Sustainability Model
  • Treasury and Ecosystem Pools
    • Overview of Pools
    • Role of the Treasury
    • POL Strategy (Protocol-Owned Liquidity)
  • CaaS (Contributions-as-a-Service)
    • What is CaaS
    • Exporting the PoG System
    • Integration Possibilities
    • Revenue Model for Axynom
  • Governance & Voting
    • Governance Phases
    • Voting Power (AXY + GP)
    • Quorum & Approval Logic
    • No ‘Adjust GP’ Rule
  • Gas Economics
    • Why Arbitrum One
    • Axynom L3 Chain with AXY as Gas
  • Product Roadmap
    • Phase 1: MVP Launch (Staking, PoG, Treasury)
    • Phase 2: CaaS, L3 Chain, Scaled Contributor Base
    • Key Milestones
    • TGE Timeline (After Product-Market Fit)
  • Security & Audits
    • Upgradability Practices
    • Modular Contract Architecture
    • Audit Strategy Post-TGE
    • Role of Community Peer Review
  • KPI Forecast & Growth Goals
    • Contributors, GP Points, Stakers, TVL
    • Expected PoG Submissions
    • Treasury Size & Rewards Flow
    • Marketing & KOL Activation Plans
  • Conclusion
    • Axynom Is Not a Product. It’s a Protocol.
    • Call to Builders, Shillers, Designers, Thinkers
    • How to Get Involved
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  • Estimated Submission Volume
  • Submission Categories Breakdown
  • Reward Payout Strategy
  • Anti-Spam and Quality Controls
  • Virality Preparedness
  1. KPI Forecast & Growth Goals

Expected PoG Submissions

In the first 4–6 months after TGE, Axynom expects to process a growing volume of contributor submissions, driven by transparent incentives, real-world payout logic, and direct access to GP and AXY rewards.

The submission system is designed to reward real work, not spam. It favors quality, relevance, and ongoing contribution over one-off farming.


Estimated Submission Volume

Month
Active Contributors
Avg Submissions/User
Monthly Submissions

1

100 – 150

3 – 5

300 – 750

2

150 – 250

4 – 6

600 – 1,200

3–4

300 – 500

4 – 8

1,200 – 3,000

5–6

500 – 700+

5 – 10

2,500 – 5,000

By Month 6: Axynom may have over 10,000 submissions processed, with a steady contributor base submitting 2–3 times per week.


Submission Categories Breakdown

Category
Est. % of Submissions
Description

Tweets / Threads

30–40%

Shortform shilling, engagement threads

Memes / Graphics

20–25%

Static or animated content, formats vary

Articles / Blogs

10–15%

Medium-level research or protocol writing

Short Videos / Edits

10–15%

Scripts, edits, reels, X-format videos

Design / UI/UX

5–10%

Posters, Figma pages, creative assets

Code Contributions

3–5%

Fixes, helper tools, integrations

Governance / Strategy

2–5%

Research, proposals, improvement ideas

Submissions will vary by campaign, but the system is built to scale fairly across all categories.


Reward Payout Strategy

  • 1 GP = 1 AXY by default

  • Rewards are budgeted monthly based on Treasury health and GP pool capacity

  • Payouts will follow a fair-pay model:

    • ~$1–$2 for low-effort content

    • ~$10–$25 for mid-level contributions

    • ~$50–$150 for high-effort work (video, design, growth campaigns, dev)

📌 Monthly PoG Reward Budget: 100,000 – 300,000 GP (AXY) = ~$5,000 – $15,000 → Scales depending on Treasury inflows, TGE raise size, and strategic goals


Anti-Spam and Quality Controls

To maintain integrity and fairness:

  • All submissions go through approval (admin or voter-based depending on governance phase)

  • Duplicate or AI-spam entries rejected outright

  • Tiered reviewer roles introduced over time (contributors become reviewers)

  • Feedback and transparency: Every approval has traceable logic

Only work that matches campaign criteria and basic quality standards is approved and rewarded.


Virality Preparedness

Based on viral behavior seen in Zealy, Layer3, and airdrop communities, Axynom will prepare for:

  • Sudden spikes in submissions during reward campaigns

  • Referral-driven onboarding of contributors and shillers

  • Tiered reward limits per contributor to prevent hoarding

  • Batch GP budgeting per campaign to ensure fairness and sustainability

Even if virality occurs faster than forecasted, the PoG logic caps what the system can distribute.


Axynom’s PoG system is a fully modeled, scalable rewards engine designed to power an ecosystem of 10,000+ real submissions without compromising quality, fairness, or economic integrity.

The system grows at the pace of verified effort, not noise.

PreviousContributors, GP Points, Stakers, TVLNextTreasury Size & Rewards Flow

Last updated 1 month ago