Axynom
  • Introduction
    • What is Axynom?
    • Vision & Mission
  • Why Now
  • Founder's Note
  • The Problem
    • Centralized growth traps
  • Token reward inflation and failure
  • Lack of contributor alignment
  • Gatekeeping in Web3
  • Axynom Solution Overview
    • Proof of Growth (PoG)
    • Contributor as a Stakeholder
    • Transparent Rewards and Governance
  • Modular Ecosystem Architecture
  • PoG: Proof of Growth System
    • What is PoG
    • How Contributions Work
    • Voting and Governance Flow
  • GP: Growth Points
  • Role of Admins, Moderators, and Community
  • Examples of Valid Contributions
  • Axynom Token (AXY)
    • Token Utility
    • Tokenomics
  • Transfer Tax Logic
  • Governance Eligibility
  • Vesting and Distribution
  • Staking Mechanics
    • Lock Periods and APY
    • Early Exit Penalties
    • Sustainability Model
  • Treasury and Ecosystem Pools
    • Overview of Pools
    • Role of the Treasury
    • POL Strategy (Protocol-Owned Liquidity)
  • CaaS (Contributions-as-a-Service)
    • What is CaaS
    • Exporting the PoG System
    • Integration Possibilities
    • Revenue Model for Axynom
  • Governance & Voting
    • Governance Phases
    • Voting Power (AXY + GP)
    • Quorum & Approval Logic
    • No ‘Adjust GP’ Rule
  • Gas Economics
    • Why Arbitrum One
    • Axynom L3 Chain with AXY as Gas
  • Product Roadmap
    • Phase 1: MVP Launch (Staking, PoG, Treasury)
    • Phase 2: CaaS, L3 Chain, Scaled Contributor Base
    • Key Milestones
    • TGE Timeline (After Product-Market Fit)
  • Security & Audits
    • Upgradability Practices
    • Modular Contract Architecture
    • Audit Strategy Post-TGE
    • Role of Community Peer Review
  • KPI Forecast & Growth Goals
    • Contributors, GP Points, Stakers, TVL
    • Expected PoG Submissions
    • Treasury Size & Rewards Flow
    • Marketing & KOL Activation Plans
  • Conclusion
    • Axynom Is Not a Product. It’s a Protocol.
    • Call to Builders, Shillers, Designers, Thinkers
    • How to Get Involved
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  1. Axynom Solution Overview

Contributor as a Stakeholder

Axynom treats contributors as core participants in the protocol, not external helpers. Their work creates value, so the system gives them a way to earn value in return.

This changes the default position of the contributor. They are no longer passive supporters. They are stakeholders.

Through Growth Points, contributors receive:

  • A record of their involvement

  • Access to rewards

  • Future governance power

  • Long-term visibility within the protocol

This is not symbolic. It is structural.

Comparison: Traditional Roles vs Axynom Roles

Role
Traditional Protocols
Axynom

Community member

Follows updates

Can earn reputation and influence

Promoter

Works for exposure or tips

Gets on-chain credit and GP

Designer

Commission-based, short-term

Can become a recurring contributor

Researcher

Work stays off-chain

Tracked, verified, and rewarded

Builder

Often sidelined without connections

Positioned as a long-term stakeholder


This structure encourages consistent effort. It also makes the protocol more resilient, because the people growing it are directly tied to its outcome.

The more you contribute, the more you matter.

PreviousProof of Growth (PoG)NextTransparent Rewards and Governance

Last updated 1 month ago