Axynom
  • Introduction
    • What is Axynom?
    • Vision & Mission
  • Why Now
  • Founder's Note
  • The Problem
    • Centralized growth traps
  • Token reward inflation and failure
  • Lack of contributor alignment
  • Gatekeeping in Web3
  • Axynom Solution Overview
    • Proof of Growth (PoG)
    • Contributor as a Stakeholder
    • Transparent Rewards and Governance
  • Modular Ecosystem Architecture
  • PoG: Proof of Growth System
    • What is PoG
    • How Contributions Work
    • Voting and Governance Flow
  • GP: Growth Points
  • Role of Admins, Moderators, and Community
  • Examples of Valid Contributions
  • Axynom Token (AXY)
    • Token Utility
    • Tokenomics
  • Transfer Tax Logic
  • Governance Eligibility
  • Vesting and Distribution
  • Staking Mechanics
    • Lock Periods and APY
    • Early Exit Penalties
    • Sustainability Model
  • Treasury and Ecosystem Pools
    • Overview of Pools
    • Role of the Treasury
    • POL Strategy (Protocol-Owned Liquidity)
  • CaaS (Contributions-as-a-Service)
    • What is CaaS
    • Exporting the PoG System
    • Integration Possibilities
    • Revenue Model for Axynom
  • Governance & Voting
    • Governance Phases
    • Voting Power (AXY + GP)
    • Quorum & Approval Logic
    • No ‘Adjust GP’ Rule
  • Gas Economics
    • Why Arbitrum One
    • Axynom L3 Chain with AXY as Gas
  • Product Roadmap
    • Phase 1: MVP Launch (Staking, PoG, Treasury)
    • Phase 2: CaaS, L3 Chain, Scaled Contributor Base
    • Key Milestones
    • TGE Timeline (After Product-Market Fit)
  • Security & Audits
    • Upgradability Practices
    • Modular Contract Architecture
    • Audit Strategy Post-TGE
    • Role of Community Peer Review
  • KPI Forecast & Growth Goals
    • Contributors, GP Points, Stakers, TVL
    • Expected PoG Submissions
    • Treasury Size & Rewards Flow
    • Marketing & KOL Activation Plans
  • Conclusion
    • Axynom Is Not a Product. It’s a Protocol.
    • Call to Builders, Shillers, Designers, Thinkers
    • How to Get Involved
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  1. Axynom Solution Overview

Transparent Rewards and Governance

In Axynom, both rewards and governance follow clear, trackable rules.

There are no hidden allocations, closed decisions, or surprise payouts. Everything flows through smart contracts, visible, verifiable, and enforced on-chain.

When a contributor submits work, the process is public:

  • The submission is reviewed

  • It is either approved or rejected

  • If approved, Growth Points are granted

  • Rewards can be claimed

  • Records are permanent

There is no backchannel, no favoritism, no hidden steps. The same applies to governance.


What makes rewards and governance transparent

Feature
Description

On-chain submissions

Contributions are stored and tracked publicly

GP assignment rules

Growth Points follow clear approval logic

Redeemable rewards

Contributors can claim AXY or other assets directly from reward contracts

Voting eligibility

Based on staked AXY, earned GP, or whitelisting

Admin override visibility

Admin decisions are visible and traceable


This structure ensures fairness at every level.

  • Contributors know how rewards are calculated

  • Voters know what they are approving

  • Users know who is earning what, and why

Transparency is not a feature in Axynom. It is the foundation.

PreviousContributor as a StakeholderNextModular Ecosystem Architecture

Last updated 1 month ago