Axynom
  • Introduction
    • What is Axynom?
    • Vision & Mission
  • Why Now
  • Founder's Note
  • The Problem
    • Centralized growth traps
  • Token reward inflation and failure
  • Lack of contributor alignment
  • Gatekeeping in Web3
  • Axynom Solution Overview
    • Proof of Growth (PoG)
    • Contributor as a Stakeholder
    • Transparent Rewards and Governance
  • Modular Ecosystem Architecture
  • PoG: Proof of Growth System
    • What is PoG
    • How Contributions Work
    • Voting and Governance Flow
  • GP: Growth Points
  • Role of Admins, Moderators, and Community
  • Examples of Valid Contributions
  • Axynom Token (AXY)
    • Token Utility
    • Tokenomics
  • Transfer Tax Logic
  • Governance Eligibility
  • Vesting and Distribution
  • Staking Mechanics
    • Lock Periods and APY
    • Early Exit Penalties
    • Sustainability Model
  • Treasury and Ecosystem Pools
    • Overview of Pools
    • Role of the Treasury
    • POL Strategy (Protocol-Owned Liquidity)
  • CaaS (Contributions-as-a-Service)
    • What is CaaS
    • Exporting the PoG System
    • Integration Possibilities
    • Revenue Model for Axynom
  • Governance & Voting
    • Governance Phases
    • Voting Power (AXY + GP)
    • Quorum & Approval Logic
    • No ‘Adjust GP’ Rule
  • Gas Economics
    • Why Arbitrum One
    • Axynom L3 Chain with AXY as Gas
  • Product Roadmap
    • Phase 1: MVP Launch (Staking, PoG, Treasury)
    • Phase 2: CaaS, L3 Chain, Scaled Contributor Base
    • Key Milestones
    • TGE Timeline (After Product-Market Fit)
  • Security & Audits
    • Upgradability Practices
    • Modular Contract Architecture
    • Audit Strategy Post-TGE
    • Role of Community Peer Review
  • KPI Forecast & Growth Goals
    • Contributors, GP Points, Stakers, TVL
    • Expected PoG Submissions
    • Treasury Size & Rewards Flow
    • Marketing & KOL Activation Plans
  • Conclusion
    • Axynom Is Not a Product. It’s a Protocol.
    • Call to Builders, Shillers, Designers, Thinkers
    • How to Get Involved
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  • Lock Periods
  • APY Structure
  • Staking Cap and Sustainability
  1. Staking Mechanics

Lock Periods and APY

Staking in Axynom is designed to reward long-term commitment, create predictable yield flows, and support the overall stability of the AXY token economy.

Unlike protocols that offer volatile or unsustainable APYs, Axynom uses a fixed, tiered reward structure tied to lock periods. This system ensures that rewards are transparent, calculable, and resistant to short-term exploitation.

Staking is more than an investment mechanic. It is a direct form of economic alignment with the protocol’s mission and success.


Lock Periods

Users can stake AXY across three predefined lock durations:

Lock Period
APY
Description

6 Months

5%

Short-term staking, accessible for new participants

1 Year

12%

Balanced option for contributors seeking higher rewards

2 Years

30%

Highest yield, designed for long-term ecosystem builders

Each lock period represents a commitment. Tokens are fully locked during the period and cannot be unstaked without incurring penalties (explained in the Early Exit Penalties section).

After the lock period ends, users may either withdraw their tokens and rewards or continue staking with a reward boost.


APY Structure

The Annual Percentage Yields (APYs) for each lock tier are fixed at deployment but may be adjusted through governance proposals in later phases if needed to reflect new economic realities.

APYs are:

  • Guaranteed for users who fulfill the full lock duration

  • Paid in AXY sourced from the Rewards Pool

  • Calculated and distributed automatically through the staking contract

Rewards accumulate over time and can be claimed either at unlock or, in some cases, through scheduled reward harvesting depending on the chosen lock and future upgrades.

There is no auto-compounding at the contract level. Users must manually re-stake if they wish to compound their rewards after lock expiry.


Staking Cap and Sustainability

Each lock period has a staking cap to prevent over-saturation:

  • If a lock period reaches its cap, no new deposits are accepted until space becomes available.

  • Caps are set based on projected reward budgets to ensure that the protocol does not overcommit future emissions.

  • Caps can be adjusted by governance if required.

This approach protects the Rewards Pool from depletion and keeps staking rewards sustainable as protocol activity grows.


Staking is not just a way to earn yield. It is a signal of trust and alignment, a vote of confidence in the protocol’s vision, mechanics, and future.

Participants who stake longer, earn more, and play a greater role in Axynom’s governance ecosystem.

PreviousVesting and DistributionNextEarly Exit Penalties

Last updated 1 month ago