Axynom
  • Introduction
    • What is Axynom?
    • Vision & Mission
  • Why Now
  • Founder's Note
  • The Problem
    • Centralized growth traps
  • Token reward inflation and failure
  • Lack of contributor alignment
  • Gatekeeping in Web3
  • Axynom Solution Overview
    • Proof of Growth (PoG)
    • Contributor as a Stakeholder
    • Transparent Rewards and Governance
  • Modular Ecosystem Architecture
  • PoG: Proof of Growth System
    • What is PoG
    • How Contributions Work
    • Voting and Governance Flow
  • GP: Growth Points
  • Role of Admins, Moderators, and Community
  • Examples of Valid Contributions
  • Axynom Token (AXY)
    • Token Utility
    • Tokenomics
  • Transfer Tax Logic
  • Governance Eligibility
  • Vesting and Distribution
  • Staking Mechanics
    • Lock Periods and APY
    • Early Exit Penalties
    • Sustainability Model
  • Treasury and Ecosystem Pools
    • Overview of Pools
    • Role of the Treasury
    • POL Strategy (Protocol-Owned Liquidity)
  • CaaS (Contributions-as-a-Service)
    • What is CaaS
    • Exporting the PoG System
    • Integration Possibilities
    • Revenue Model for Axynom
  • Governance & Voting
    • Governance Phases
    • Voting Power (AXY + GP)
    • Quorum & Approval Logic
    • No ‘Adjust GP’ Rule
  • Gas Economics
    • Why Arbitrum One
    • Axynom L3 Chain with AXY as Gas
  • Product Roadmap
    • Phase 1: MVP Launch (Staking, PoG, Treasury)
    • Phase 2: CaaS, L3 Chain, Scaled Contributor Base
    • Key Milestones
    • TGE Timeline (After Product-Market Fit)
  • Security & Audits
    • Upgradability Practices
    • Modular Contract Architecture
    • Audit Strategy Post-TGE
    • Role of Community Peer Review
  • KPI Forecast & Growth Goals
    • Contributors, GP Points, Stakers, TVL
    • Expected PoG Submissions
    • Treasury Size & Rewards Flow
    • Marketing & KOL Activation Plans
  • Conclusion
    • Axynom Is Not a Product. It’s a Protocol.
    • Call to Builders, Shillers, Designers, Thinkers
    • How to Get Involved
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  • AXY Staked
  • Lifetime GP
  • Combined Voting Weight
  • Safeguards and Rules
  1. Governance & Voting

Voting Power (AXY + GP)

Voting power in Axynom is determined by two complementary factors: AXY staked and Lifetime Growth Points (GP) accumulated.

This dual-weight model ensures that governance is balanced between financial commitment and active contribution. Participants who have invested capital in the protocol and those who have invested effort both have a say in its direction.

The voting system is designed to prevent domination by passive holders while rewarding contributors who have consistently supported the ecosystem.


AXY Staked

AXY staking serves as the primary economic foundation for governance eligibility. Participants who stake AXY for any lock duration are eligible to vote on proposals, contribution approvals, and operational matters.

Voting weight from staking is proportional to:

  • Amount of AXY staked

  • Lock duration (longer locks may receive enhanced weight if enabled through governance)

Only actively staked AXY counts toward voting power. Liquid, unstaked AXY held in wallets or exchanges is excluded to prevent vote manipulation through temporary balance shifting.


Lifetime GP

Lifetime GP represents a participant’s historical contribution to the protocol. It measures cumulative effort rather than capital.

Participants who surpass a defined threshold (e.g., 250 Lifetime GP) gain additional voting weight, independent of their AXY holdings.

  • Lifetime GP cannot be transferred or sold.

  • It does not decay or expire.

  • It serves as a permanent, on-chain record of value creation.

This ensures that contributors who have consistently supported Axynom with work, even if they are not major token holders, retain a meaningful voice in governance.


Combined Voting Weight

Voting power for any eligible participant is calculated as a sum of two components:

Component
Weight Source

AXY Voting Weight

Based on total AXY staked and lock conditions

GP Voting Weight

Based on total Lifetime GP accumulated

The protocol may apply governance-set ratios to balance the relative impact of capital vs contribution, depending on the governance phase and growth needs.

For example:

  • 1 staked AXY could equal 1 vote

  • 10 Lifetime GP could equal 1 vote

Final ratios are flexible and adjustable through governance proposals.


Safeguards and Rules

To preserve governance integrity:

  • Minimum AXY stake and/or Lifetime GP thresholds are required to participate in voting.

  • Wallets attempting to game the system (e.g., splitting stakes to inflate influence) can be mitigated through aggregation or anti-sybil measures.

  • Voting activity is recorded transparently and auditable through governance dashboards.

Participation is tied to real commitment, not temporary influence.


Axynom’s voting power system is designed to be fair, resilient, and future-proof. It aligns protocol governance with the people who build, grow, and believe in it, across both capital and contribution dimensions.

PreviousGovernance PhasesNextQuorum & Approval Logic

Last updated 1 month ago