Axynom
  • Introduction
    • What is Axynom?
    • Vision & Mission
  • Why Now
  • Founder's Note
  • The Problem
    • Centralized growth traps
  • Token reward inflation and failure
  • Lack of contributor alignment
  • Gatekeeping in Web3
  • Axynom Solution Overview
    • Proof of Growth (PoG)
    • Contributor as a Stakeholder
    • Transparent Rewards and Governance
  • Modular Ecosystem Architecture
  • PoG: Proof of Growth System
    • What is PoG
    • How Contributions Work
    • Voting and Governance Flow
  • GP: Growth Points
  • Role of Admins, Moderators, and Community
  • Examples of Valid Contributions
  • Axynom Token (AXY)
    • Token Utility
    • Tokenomics
  • Transfer Tax Logic
  • Governance Eligibility
  • Vesting and Distribution
  • Staking Mechanics
    • Lock Periods and APY
    • Early Exit Penalties
    • Sustainability Model
  • Treasury and Ecosystem Pools
    • Overview of Pools
    • Role of the Treasury
    • POL Strategy (Protocol-Owned Liquidity)
  • CaaS (Contributions-as-a-Service)
    • What is CaaS
    • Exporting the PoG System
    • Integration Possibilities
    • Revenue Model for Axynom
  • Governance & Voting
    • Governance Phases
    • Voting Power (AXY + GP)
    • Quorum & Approval Logic
    • No ‘Adjust GP’ Rule
  • Gas Economics
    • Why Arbitrum One
    • Axynom L3 Chain with AXY as Gas
  • Product Roadmap
    • Phase 1: MVP Launch (Staking, PoG, Treasury)
    • Phase 2: CaaS, L3 Chain, Scaled Contributor Base
    • Key Milestones
    • TGE Timeline (After Product-Market Fit)
  • Security & Audits
    • Upgradability Practices
    • Modular Contract Architecture
    • Audit Strategy Post-TGE
    • Role of Community Peer Review
  • KPI Forecast & Growth Goals
    • Contributors, GP Points, Stakers, TVL
    • Expected PoG Submissions
    • Treasury Size & Rewards Flow
    • Marketing & KOL Activation Plans
  • Conclusion
    • Axynom Is Not a Product. It’s a Protocol.
    • Call to Builders, Shillers, Designers, Thinkers
    • How to Get Involved
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  • Penalty Structure
  • Destination of Penalties
  • Example
  • Strategic Role of Penalties
  1. Staking Mechanics

Early Exit Penalties

To maintain fairness, protect the Rewards Pool, and discourage speculative behavior, Axynom applies structured penalties to users who attempt to withdraw their staked AXY before the completion of their chosen lock period.

The early exit system is designed to create clear consequences without being punitive. It respects user autonomy while prioritizing the sustainability of staking rewards for committed participants.


Penalty Structure

The penalty is proportional to how much of the lock period has been completed at the time of withdrawal.

There are two penalty tiers:

Completion Percentage
Penalty Rate
Description

Less than 66% completed

50%

High penalty for exiting before major commitment

66% to 99% completed

34%

Reduced penalty as user approaches full maturity

  • If a user exits before completing 66% of their lock period, 50% of their pending rewards are forfeited.

  • If a user exits after completing 66%, but before full maturity, 34% of their pending rewards are forfeited.

The penalty applies only to pending rewards, not the principal staked amount. Users always recover their full original deposit.


Destination of Penalties

Forfeited rewards are not burned or returned to the general Rewards Pool. Instead, they are redirected to the Treasury Pool, where they can be:

  • Recycled into new contributor campaigns

  • Used for platform development

  • Held for future staking boosts or incentive experiments

This structure ensures that penalties actively contribute to the protocol’s growth, rather than simply being lost.


Example

If a user locks 10,000 AXY for 1 year (12% APY) and tries to exit after 5 months:

  • 5 months represents roughly 41% of the lock period.

  • Penalty applied: 50% of pending rewards forfeited.

  • The user recovers 100% of their principal and 50% of earned rewards up to that point.

  • The other 50% is redirected to the Treasury.

If the same user exits after 9 months:

  • 9 months represents 75% of the lock period.

  • Penalty applied: 34% of pending rewards forfeited.

The structure fairly rewards near-completion while still discouraging short-term farming strategies.


Strategic Role of Penalties

Early exit penalties serve multiple important functions:

  • Preserve reward sustainability for committed users

  • Discourage speculative, fast-exit behavior

  • Strengthen the Treasury without needing new token issuance

  • Align incentives between users, contributors, and the broader protocol

They are not intended to trap participants, but to enforce the logic that long-term commitment deserves greater rewards.

PreviousLock Periods and APYNextSustainability Model

Last updated 1 month ago