Axynom
  • Introduction
    • What is Axynom?
    • Vision & Mission
  • Why Now
  • Founder's Note
  • The Problem
    • Centralized growth traps
  • Token reward inflation and failure
  • Lack of contributor alignment
  • Gatekeeping in Web3
  • Axynom Solution Overview
    • Proof of Growth (PoG)
    • Contributor as a Stakeholder
    • Transparent Rewards and Governance
  • Modular Ecosystem Architecture
  • PoG: Proof of Growth System
    • What is PoG
    • How Contributions Work
    • Voting and Governance Flow
  • GP: Growth Points
  • Role of Admins, Moderators, and Community
  • Examples of Valid Contributions
  • Axynom Token (AXY)
    • Token Utility
    • Tokenomics
  • Transfer Tax Logic
  • Governance Eligibility
  • Vesting and Distribution
  • Staking Mechanics
    • Lock Periods and APY
    • Early Exit Penalties
    • Sustainability Model
  • Treasury and Ecosystem Pools
    • Overview of Pools
    • Role of the Treasury
    • POL Strategy (Protocol-Owned Liquidity)
  • CaaS (Contributions-as-a-Service)
    • What is CaaS
    • Exporting the PoG System
    • Integration Possibilities
    • Revenue Model for Axynom
  • Governance & Voting
    • Governance Phases
    • Voting Power (AXY + GP)
    • Quorum & Approval Logic
    • No ‘Adjust GP’ Rule
  • Gas Economics
    • Why Arbitrum One
    • Axynom L3 Chain with AXY as Gas
  • Product Roadmap
    • Phase 1: MVP Launch (Staking, PoG, Treasury)
    • Phase 2: CaaS, L3 Chain, Scaled Contributor Base
    • Key Milestones
    • TGE Timeline (After Product-Market Fit)
  • Security & Audits
    • Upgradability Practices
    • Modular Contract Architecture
    • Audit Strategy Post-TGE
    • Role of Community Peer Review
  • KPI Forecast & Growth Goals
    • Contributors, GP Points, Stakers, TVL
    • Expected PoG Submissions
    • Treasury Size & Rewards Flow
    • Marketing & KOL Activation Plans
  • Conclusion
    • Axynom Is Not a Product. It’s a Protocol.
    • Call to Builders, Shillers, Designers, Thinkers
    • How to Get Involved
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  • Eligibility Criteria
  • Role in Contribution Voting

Governance Eligibility

Governance in Axynom is structured to reflect real participation. Voting power is earned, not bought. Contributors and stakers who actively support the protocol gain influence over key decisions, from contribution approvals to future treasury strategies.

Eligibility for governance is not granted by holding tokens alone. It depends on a combination of AXY staking, Lifetime GP, and whitelisting, depending on the governance phase.


Eligibility Criteria

1. AXY Staking

Any wallet that locks AXY in the staking contract becomes eligible to participate in governance once the protocol enters Phase 2 (community voting). Minimum thresholds apply to prevent spam or passive holders from gaining voting power without commitment.

  • Governance thresholds are determined by lock duration and amount staked

  • Longer lock periods may grant more weight per token

  • Only actively staked AXY is considered (unstaked or liquid AXY does not count)

Staking reflects economic alignment. Governance power tied to stakers ensures that voters are directly exposed to the consequences of their decisions.


2. Lifetime GP

Contributors who have accumulated a minimum amount of Lifetime Growth Points (e.g. 250 GP or more) may also receive voting rights, even if they do not hold or stake large amounts of AXY.

This ensures that governance is not dominated by capital alone. Long-term contributors who have consistently grown the protocol, even through non-financial work, are included.

  • Voting access is gated by minimum Lifetime GP

  • GP is non-transferable and cannot be bought

  • Reputation-based voting ensures fairness across roles

This model gives meaningful influence to contributors who built trust through action, not position.


3. Whitelisted Voters

In the early stages of community governance, certain contributors, moderators, or ecosystem partners may be manually whitelisted for governance access.

This allows trusted actors to participate before the protocol has fully scaled its automated eligibility systems. Whitelisting is temporary and reviewed regularly.

Whitelisted voters must still act under the same voting rules, without elevated privileges or override rights.


Role in Contribution Voting

During the PoG community voting phase, eligible voters may review pending contributions and cast one of two options:

  • Approve

  • Not Approved

There is no option to edit, adjust, or delay GP amounts. Votes are binary to reduce complexity and enforce clear outcomes. If a submission reaches the defined threshold (e.g. over 60% approval), it proceeds to admin confirmation for on-chain execution.

This flow ensures that contributor rewards reflect actual community consensus, balanced by admin oversight during early governance.


Governance eligibility in Axynom is not an entitlement. It must be earned and maintained through commitment, contribution, or long-term staking. This model prevents plutocracy, reduces manipulation risk, and ensures that power flows toward active participants.

PreviousTransfer Tax LogicNextVesting and Distribution

Last updated 1 month ago